Other AMAIC sites
Slideshow
Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.Calendar
-
About
What is the Australian Marian Academy of the Immaculate Conception (AMAIC)? The Australian Marian Academy [AMA], as it was initially known, was formed in the early 1980s largely by a group of academics and teachers devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mary, particularly under her title of Our Lady of the Rosary (at Fatima). In May of 1988 this was the description of the Australian Marian Academy written into our Constitution (p. 19):
As a recognized “aggregate of persons” [CJC Can. 115] the Academy “is a private association of Christ’s faithful striving with common effort to foster a more perfect life … and to promote Christian teaching” [Can. 298]. Its Constitution has been reviewed by the competent authority [Can. 299 §3]. It chooses to exercise its juridical personhood through an Executive of 7 members. [ Can. 115, §2]. Tags
adam Adam and Eve adam eve atum tefnut amaic Ararat Archaeological Ages australian marian academy of the immaculate conception Australian Marian Acdaemy of the Immaculate Conception Black Sea Flood Noah’s Flood Genesis Flood brett palmer skeptic Carol A. Hill charles pellegrino return to sodom and gomorrah Chronology Alpha Omega Jesus Christ Lord of History Beginning and End compiler genesis coral Creationism creationist flood model Creation Science Cudi Dagh Cush Damien F. Mackey Damien F Mackey Just How Great was the Genesis Flood? Dan Gill Deluge Dr. Charles Willis Eden eden ground zero Euphrates Flood four rivers genesis genesis flood genesis flood adam noah Geological Ages Gihon how global Genesis Flood Jesus Suras Chinese dynasties John D Morris Institute of Creation Research ten ancestors Flood Joel D Klenck Region of Eden Creation Research Science Quarterly Mark Isaak Flood stories worldwide Noah’s Ark Judi Dagh Cudi Dagh Village of Eight Noah noah's genesis flood not global Paradise Pishon PJ Wiseman six days universal flood Stone Ages TigrisArchives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
Recent Comments
- houston texans jersey on Noah’s Flood: A Bird’s-Eye View
- ugg boots mini on Arguments Against Global Genesis Flood
- Laura on Returning to Paradise
- bolsas de papel on Christian Youth Maybe Not Impressed by Pseudo-Science
- enter to win a free ipad on Creationists Now Espousing Link Between Pre and Post Flood Worlds
Meta
-
Recent Posts
Categories
-
Syndication
Categories
Tag Archives: fossil ida
Christian Youth Maybe Not Impressed by Pseudo-Science
Why are young people leaving the church?
Groundbreaking study says Sunday School makes exit more likely
This is the title of a WorldNetDaily Exclusive article.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100324
What does the age of the Earth have to do with the exodus of young people from American churches? Ken Ham, known for his Answers in Genesis creation-science ministry, says a major study he commissioned by a respected researcher unveils for the first time in a scientific fashion the startling reasons behind statistics that show two-thirds of young people in evangelical churches will leave when they move into their 20s. The study, highlighted in Ham’s new book with researcher Britt Beemer, “Already Gone: Why your kids will quit church and what you can do to stop it,” finds church youth already are “lost” in their hearts and minds in elementary, middle and high school – not in college as many assume. “A lot of the research already done has been to find out how many believe, how many support abortion, believe in the resurrection, say they’re born again,” Ham told WND. “But nobody has really ever delved into why two-thirds of young people will walk away from the church.”
Part of the problem, we at the AMAIC believe, is because the young people who attend these schools are being asked to accept a science that is based upon a false interpretation of the Book of Genesis. It is actually a pseudo-science, that can easily be shown up by, not only opponents of religion, but also sincere and reliable scientists, to be false – even absurd. And quite un-biblical. Naturally intelligent young minds of an enquiring bent will come to see the ridiculousness of what they are being asked to believe, and will reject it. Perhaps they will also reject the Bible, and even God; all of which they will have been taught to be inextricably connected: i.e. God, Bible, ‘Creation Science’.
The survey found, much to Ham’s surprise, a “Sunday School syndrome,” indicating children who faithfully attend Bible classes in their church over the years actually are more likely to question the authority of Scripture. “This is a brutal wake-up call for the church, showing how our programs and our approaches to Christian education are failing dismally,” Ham writes in the book. Among the survey findings, regular participants in Sunday School are more likely to:
- Leave the church
- Believe that the Bible is less true
- Defend the legality of abortion and same-sex marriage
- Defend premarital sex
Ham sees one overarching problem that is related to how churches and parents have taught youth to understand the Genesis account of creation. Ham – who believes in a literal six-day creation that happened 6,000 to 10,000 years ago – says the church opened a door for the exodus of youth, beginning in the 19th century, when it began teaching that “the age of the Earth is not an issue as long as you trust in Jesus and believe in the resurrection and the Gospel accounts.”
|
|
“What you see in the Bible is that when there is compromise in one generation, and it’s not dealt with, you usually notice it to a greater extent in the next generation,” Ham told WND.
No the problem, in part, is the faulty interpretation of the Six Days of Genesis 1. See other articles at this site:http://genesisflood.blog.com
but especially at:
http://genesis1.blog.com
In previous generations, young people could live with this inconsistency, he said, but with an increasingly secular and atheistic public education system – where some 90 percent of church-going youth are trained – today’s youth find it hard to see a connection between what they are taught in church and what they learn at school.
There should be no inconsistency with true Faith and true science.
“Because of the way in which they’ve been educated,” Ham said, teens come to believe “that what they are taught in school is reality, but the church teaches stories and morality and relationship. Bible teaching is not real in the sense of real history.”
This sort of Bible teaching is not always real in the sense that it is not always properly biblical.
Now, as parents or leaders tell youth they can “continue to believe in evolution, millions of years,” Ham said, young people are starting to see, ‘Well, I can then believe what I’m taught at school – but school has nothing to do with God.’” The key issue is that this doubt about the Bible’s account of origins causes youth to doubt the authority of Scripture, he said. “Salvation is not conditioned on what you believe about the age of the Earth and the six days of creation,” Ham said. “There are many who believe in millions of years and are Christians.” But the Genesis issue does matter, he contends, “because salvation does rise or fall on the authority of Scripture. The message of the Gospel comes from these words of Scripture.” When that Bible is undermined, he explained, everything it teaches is in doubt.
We fully agree with this at least.
Helping young people make sense of reports such as the claim last month of the discovery of a “missing link” proving Darwin’s theory of evolution is Ham’s specialty.
In a May 19 interview with WND, he pointed to a line in the scientific report about the discovery that countered the researchers’ bold claims to media. The fossil’s species “could represent a stem group from which later anthropoid primates evolved [the line leading to humans],” states the report, published in the online journal Public Library of Science, “but we are not advocating this here.”
The London Guardian newspaper also reported that scientific reviewers of the research asked that others “tone down” claims that the fossil was on the human evolutionary line.
“The reviewers said we don’t know this is a missing link, and they asked the people who wrote [the newspaper reports] to tone it down,” Ham told WND, “and yet we have this media hype claiming this is it, this is the missing link.”
Good. Stick with what you know.
Continue reading