Other AMAIC sites
Slideshow
Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.Calendar
-
About
What is the Australian Marian Academy of the Immaculate Conception (AMAIC)? The Australian Marian Academy [AMA], as it was initially known, was formed in the early 1980s largely by a group of academics and teachers devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mary, particularly under her title of Our Lady of the Rosary (at Fatima). In May of 1988 this was the description of the Australian Marian Academy written into our Constitution (p. 19):
As a recognized “aggregate of persons” [CJC Can. 115] the Academy “is a private association of Christ’s faithful striving with common effort to foster a more perfect life … and to promote Christian teaching” [Can. 298]. Its Constitution has been reviewed by the competent authority [Can. 299 §3]. It chooses to exercise its juridical personhood through an Executive of 7 members. [ Can. 115, §2]. Tags
adam Adam and Eve adam eve atum tefnut amaic Ararat Archaeological Ages australian marian academy of the immaculate conception Australian Marian Acdaemy of the Immaculate Conception Black Sea Flood Noah’s Flood Genesis Flood brett palmer skeptic Carol A. Hill charles pellegrino return to sodom and gomorrah Chronology Alpha Omega Jesus Christ Lord of History Beginning and End compiler genesis coral Creationism creationist flood model Creation Science Cudi Dagh Cush Damien F. Mackey Damien F Mackey Just How Great was the Genesis Flood? Dan Gill Deluge Dr. Charles Willis Eden eden ground zero Euphrates Flood four rivers genesis genesis flood genesis flood adam noah Geological Ages Gihon how global Genesis Flood Jesus Suras Chinese dynasties John D Morris Institute of Creation Research ten ancestors Flood Joel D Klenck Region of Eden Creation Research Science Quarterly Mark Isaak Flood stories worldwide Noah’s Ark Judi Dagh Cudi Dagh Village of Eight Noah noah's genesis flood not global Paradise Pishon PJ Wiseman six days universal flood Stone Ages TigrisArchives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
Recent Comments
- houston texans jersey on Noah’s Flood: A Bird’s-Eye View
- ugg boots mini on Arguments Against Global Genesis Flood
- Laura on Returning to Paradise
- bolsas de papel on Christian Youth Maybe Not Impressed by Pseudo-Science
- enter to win a free ipad on Creationists Now Espousing Link Between Pre and Post Flood Worlds
Meta
-
Recent Posts
Categories
-
Syndication
Categories
Tag Archives: Archaeological Ages
Supplement to ‘Just How Global Was the Great Flood’?
Preface
“… at the end of the sixth age-day [sic] of Gen. 1:26-30, we have Old Stone Age Man with his agricultural revolution in the “Garden of Eden” 10,000 years B.C. This is followed by surprising New Stone Age City developments of Catal Hüyük in Turkey, and Jericho, 8000 to 5000 B.C. [sic]“.
reconstruction. Thus he continues (ibid.):
“… the Chalcolithic period is referred to
I give here some quotes from Pearce’s book, relevant to the above:
On Wiseman (ibid.): “the characteristic of the toledoth is not dependent upon our acceptance of P. J. Wiseman’s theory, however, although his theory is worthy of consideration …”.
On Yahuda (p. 21): “… Professor A. S. Yahuda … concludes that the patriarchs brought the stories from Mesopotamia (hence the Sumerian words) and Moses incorporated them in his records, which contained Egyptian words …”.
On Teilhard. Pearce admittedly gives the Jesuit priest only qualified approval (p. 10): “For many theologians who are showing interest in anthropology through the works of Teilhard de Chardin, I have endeavoured to show the limitation he suffered because of the position of science at the time of his writing, without detracting from his positive contributions”. (He repeats this theme on pp. 12, 117, 118, 119, 121, 125).
On Adam: “Thus Genesis 1 is a general introduction to the creation of man, both Old and New Stone Age, late in the sixth age-day, but it is left to the second toledoth to enlarge upon the appearance finally of the New Stone Age. … The third toledoth is a good summary of this development (Gen. 5:1-5 RSV). This man named Adam … a New Stone Age farmer of about 10,000-12,000 years ago”.
at the proper Stone Age, and archaeological, alignments for early Genesis.
Introduction
A. The Geological Ages;
B. The Stone Ages; and
C. The Archaeological Ages.
Points of Co-ordination
contrast the standard linear time system with my revised version.
These revised charts (see pp. 7, 11 & 13) are only rudimentary at this stage and will need further development.
Firstly, the conventional sequence for A-C is basically as follows (all dates are BC and are most approximate):
Chart 1 (Conventional Arrangement)
A: Geological Ages
| Date 3000 Million Plus 600 Million 500 Million 450 Million 400 Million 350 Million 310 Million 280 Million 220 Million 180 Million 130 Million 60 Million 1 Million |
Era Proterozoic/ Archaeozoic Palaeozoic Mesozoic Cenozoic |
Period Cambrian Ordovician Silurian Devonian Mississippian Pennsylvanian Permean Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous Eocene Oligocene Miocene Pliocene Pleistocene |
Evolving Life Algae/Bacteria Molluscs, Sponges Jelly Fish Insects, Mosses Sharks, Ferns Amphibians Reptiles, Coal Reptiles Dinosaurs, Conifers Flowering, Birds Primates, Mammals Monkeys Apes Hominids Man |
B: Stone Ages
| Date 2-1500,000 Million 90,000 40-38,000 17,000-8500 8300-6000 6000-5000 4500 3500 |
Period Palaeolithic (Lower) (Middle) (Upper) Mesolithic/Epi-Palaeolithic Neolithic (Early) (Late) Chalcolithic (Ubaidian) |
Culture Acheulean Mousterian Aurignacian Kebaran Natufian ( Black Sea Flood) Eridu Ware Ghassulian Beersheba |
Activity Scavengers & Gatherers Hunters & Gatherers Farmers, Hunters & Gatherers, Herding Agriculture, Crops Orchard, Mixed farming Copper, Ivory |
5
C: Archaeological Ages
| Date 6000 5500 5000 4000 2900 2750 2650-2350 |
Period Chalcolithic Ancient Bronze Historic [Middle Bronze Age |
Culture Hassuna, Samarra , Halaf Eridu (Ubaid I) Ubaid Jemdet Nasr Sumerian Civilization Uruk I Canaanite and Egyptian cities |
Activity City Building Use of copper First temples First seals Wide use of brick Temples , houses of increasing size Urbanization Expanding trade City states Fortified towns |
Now, turning to my Flood article, I shall use the data arranged there to attempt to build a new version of Chart 1 (A-C), as Chart 2 (A-C) (revised charts to be found on pp. 7, 11 & 13).
A: Geological Ages
(p. 14):
(p. 26):
“Pleistocene and Holocene [our age] changes in world climate … were … responsible for wide fluctuations in the level of the Gulf waters …”.
(p. 27):
After the Fall … a harsher environment may have set in … glaciation (an Ice Age).
(p. 39):
(pp. 40-41):
“… the Palaeolithic phase for Palestine has the following three standard subdivisions:
(a) The Lower Palaeolithic – Acheulean.
(b) The Middle Palaeolithic – Mousterian.
(c) The Upper Palaeolithic – Aurignacian”.
[Osgood] … though will … challenge this linear view, referring to “the possible horizontal contemporaneity of at least the last two of these cultures, the Mousterian and the Aurignacian”. But the more interesting point that Dr. Osgood makes is that of the need … for radically re-locating the Acheulean phase, and its characteristic hand-axe, downwards … from the early Stone Age to the early post-Flood period …:
“There is strong evidence for a very wet climate in The Middle East and for left-over basins of water over many areas of the Middle East in the early days which the biblical model would allow to be called post-Flood, but which the evolutionary model would call the stone age. ….
… [east Jordan] … the stratification in the north, west, and south trenches reflects the existence of a Pleistocene pluvial lake that shrank until a widespread marsh formed during the Early Neolithic”.
… Grimal has the Acheulean culture following a pluvial period, though he dates the Acheulean somewhat later than does Osgood, to Middle Palaeolithic …:
The evidence suggests a starting point for Egyptian prehistory at the end of the Abbassia Pluvial period in the Middle Palaeolithic (c. 120,000-90,000 BC).
The Naqada I and II phases in Egypt , whose cultures are, respectively, Amratian and Gerzean, are conventionally assigned to the Chalcolithic stage of the Stone Ages. But Osgood … appears to re-assign Naqada I and II to the same wet phase of the Acheulean culture, when large trees were growing in every part of the Nile Valley ….
Chart 2 (Revised Arrangement)
A: Geological Ages
| Date 4000 2750 2300 2100-2000 |
Era [Palaeozoic Mesozoic Cenozoic] Palaeolithic Mesolithic Neolithic Chalcolithic Palaeolithic Mesolithic Neolithic Chalcolithic (Ghassul IV) |
Period Cambrian 6 miles of sedimentary rock Genesis Riverine System |
Life/Climate Plants, Animals, Reptiles Man Ice Ages ( Jericho spring dries up) City Building (especially in S. Mesopotamia ) Development of Metals Temple building ( Black Sea Flood) Destruction of local life Wet climate Forestation (invention & use of hand axes) City Building Ur III |
B: Stone Ages
(p. 7):
(p. 8):
-
… the eventual cultural evolution (beyond Palaeolithic) from Mesolithic to Neolithic must not be confined entirely to post-diluvian times … having its origins at least in antediluvian times, primarily with Cain, likely the first city builder (Genesis 4:17) – hence Neolithic? – and with Cain’s descendants, all in southern Mesopotamia , who became more and more ‘civilized’, technologically speaking (Chalcolithic),
-
- … culminating in the vibrant Chalcolithic mid-late Ubaid period (still antediluvian), at Eridu, Uruk and Ur in southern Mesopotamia, that absorbed the Hassuna, Samarra and Halaf cultures in the north, and beyond Iraq – this archaeological phase perhaps corresponding with the likes of the highly ‘civilized’, polygamous Lamech and his sons before the Flood (Neolithic/Chalcolithic?).
… then interrupted by the Great Flood.
- … culminating in the vibrant Chalcolithic mid-late Ubaid period (still antediluvian), at Eridu, Uruk and Ur in southern Mesopotamia, that absorbed the Hassuna, Samarra and Halaf cultures in the north, and beyond Iraq – this archaeological phase perhaps corresponding with the likes of the highly ‘civilized’, polygamous Lamech and his sons before the Flood (Neolithic/Chalcolithic?).
-
But that, soon afterwards, Mesopotamian civilization in particular (cf. Genesis 11:2) was resumed … especially by Nimrod, the empire builder …; Nimrod’s phase representing the imperial Uruk I and Jemdet Nasr archaeological civilizations in southern Mesopotamia (c. 3000-2900 BC, conventional dating).
-
That finally, after Babel , there occurred the Dispersion primarily westwards, shown archaeologically most especially by the Jemdet Nasr expansion (c. 2900 BC, conventional dating), leading to the Early Bronze Age/Early Dynastic phase.
(p. 24):
Ø Adam (Palaeolithic)
Palaeolithic, the text books tell us, entirely fills the geological period called Pleistocene (part of the Quaternary period of the Palaeozoic era).
(p. 27):
Even the perennial Jericho spring dried up in Mesolithic times, necessitating a long-time abandonment of that ancient site.
(p. 28):
By the time that Adam’s sons had reached maturity, there were, recorded, features of human living that a palaeontologist might perhaps associate with Mesolithic (or Epipalaeolithic) man. I refer to the basic cultivation of crops, cultic religion and simple animal husbandry. But still largely a hunting-gathering culture. The fertile site of Jericho , a spring-fed oasis, is considered to be the most ancient cultivated site on earth (its first level of occupation being Me Continue reading